Justify the ULHC PHERO KSP 2022 Bug

To make a model is to make a toy, a prototype or the first, original, or a typical form of something. It is because of a notion, an idea of something that can be designed and created, to make a construction that can be fashioned and manufactured. Especially, one that can be put to use for a purpose. Would it not be more practical and economical if the model could be disassembled when it has served its purpose, to be reassembled and ‘recycled’ in form or structure of another model? If I can do it with a model or the prototype, I could also be able to do it with the final product. The smallest biological entities that make up all life on earth are the cells. There are also single-celled organisms, such as bacteria, that consist of a single prokaryotic cell. A big difference between the cell types is that in the eukaryotic cells there is DNA protected inside a cell nucleus. In a similar way the fabrication components, for a non living structure, whether it is a building or a machine, could basically be developed by putting together parts and portions that are a standard, a measure, a norm, or a model in comparative evaluations, for the whole structure to function for a purpose. A building, itself is a non-living complex and so is a mechanical structure, even if it is mobile, with or without, artificial intelligence. A form of life that is living, is basically one that breathes, changes form, reproduces itself and has a lifespan between birth and death. It is composed of an organic matter, manifested in functions like metabolism, growth, reproduction, and response to stimuli and adaptations to the environment, originating from within the organism. In the state of nature, an organism is an instrument, an implement or even a tool, that functions as a living system and still, it is a single individual entity. Basically, a living thing refers to things that are now, or once were alive. A non-living thing is anything that was never alive at any stage of its transitions, including the different phases of its being a gas, a liquid or a solid. Natures Grant(h) is a major physical force regarded as causing and regulating the phenomena of the world. It is impossible to change the laws of natures Grant(h). On the True Path of Nature, every transition between living and non-living matter takes place in a non-stop continuum spontaneously, which is why it may seem, that natures Grant(h) is planned or calculated. Every transition of matter, whether living or non-living, is the result of a process that increases complexity with an addition of every atom, molecule or compound, evolving the on-going molecular self replication, a self assembly and a self reassembly. The spontaneous generation of things is the supposed production of living organisms from non-living matter, as inferred from apparent appearance of life in some supposedly sterile environments. As far as we know, the Earth still remains, the only place in the universe known to harbour life as specimens of fossil evidence, from the Earth, inform most studies of abiogenesis, the original evolution of life or living organisms from inorganic or inanimate matter of atomic and molecular substances. How the plant and animal life, including humans, will ever be able to survive without fossil fuels, is thereof a state or fact of being impossible.

 

Did the answers come in 2021? 

Some of them. We have tried everyone’s patience to get an honest answer. If we have the patience to sift through the rubbish, they can also. We have not run out of patience with them. 

I can not make out, though, if the staff trained to take care of the sick or infirm, especially in a hospital, during the pandemic, has had any impact on the virus. Because even if the people are vaccinated, or have become infected without having been vaccinated, immunity is short-lived and soon another virus variant has taken over. A virus does not go about with the intention of deceiving or eluding people, yet the homo sapient species have to revise their plans repeatedly. The homo sapients have to, continuously adapt, modify and update for modern medical practice to meet individual needs, as the viruses and the homo sapients hold urgent meetings to discuss the response to the pandemic. One virus is not the other like and each one of them tends to live its own life to the fullest, despite mankind’s enormous readiness and investment with knowledge and resources to fight it. It may seem that the problem is solved when flock immunity is achieved and the virus has been defeated. At the same time, the virus  has conquered a vast majority of the human population and created enough variants to be able to return, to affect the sapient patients, only and mainly when the immune system is depressed. A virus takes advantage of opportunities as and when they arise, regardless of planning or principle. Let us hope that each team of doctors and nurses has learned enough and that the pharmaceutical companies have received a reasonable return on their investment. As for politicians, they are probably not so sure of what really happened and if the homo sapients have become wiser or just appear wise. And what could they have done better, or done otherwise, to improve national, regional and the local health care efforts? After all, it is a fundamental excuse to disguise public spending, to have the necessary preparedness to save lives, but also to have taken prophylactic measures to prevent disease and injury. I guess it has been a medicine for everyone involved or a reminder of how to prevent disease and injury, in the first place, and in the simplest way. I suspect that viruses do not go about, on purpose, not to meet the expectations of those affected, or the like. After all, the life of a virus is not very natural and they can only reproduce and develop themselves, with the help of a living host cell with the right DNA and RNA with a cell membrane, through natural selection. Given, that viruses lack the key properties, which are generally considered to be necessary criteria for defining life, such as cell structure, viruses have been described as ‘organisms on the edge of life’, since they have some, but not all such properties. It is probably this characteristic of a virus that makes it so difficult for the human immune system to develop a universal antidote.